I was going to say no need to apologize as well. You didn't attack anyone directly, just described your outlook on logotherapy...
That's a tough load to carry, not many have the strength to do it.Just because I have chosen existential nihilism as a way of coping with life,
(I lean toward it but struggle with it.)
A definition of nihilism I found is
But religious and moral principles are *not* the same, in my mind at least. You can have the second without the first. (And all the religious con men we see around have the first, without the second )the rejection of all religious and moral principles, in the belief that life is meaningless:
So much of reality seems harsh, absurd and pointless. Read the news any day of the week.What bugged me most about logotherapy is that it hinges on "meaning", as if what you think and do somehow should be defendable to make sense. Lots of external things don't have "meaning" either but you have to deal with it.
If you dwell on it too much or allow yourself to feel too much, it's absolutely numbing and depressive.
Life may be ultimately "meaningless" in the long time scale, but we do have to navigate what's in our faces every day, as you say.
We seem to be born story tellers. And neurologists/psychologists have described our brains as ongoing prediction machines, from one moment to the next, in effect creating an ongoing sense of reality moment by moment. So, we're constantly trying to make sense of things.
Viktor Frankl's ideas came from witnessing a most horrific example of "meaningless-ness" - the organized and mechanized destruction of millions of people. (I would put Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the same category, and there are others.)
His making "meaning" of the situation was a way of avoiding the utter rage and despair that would seem to result otherwise. Maybe not for everyone, but...